Term Paper

Same Sex Marriage Should Not Be Allowed Essay

Same Sex Marriage Should Not Be Allowed Essay

This marriage be saved as it should be, a marriage of self-confident, strong-willed, compassionate equals. For most of these thinkers, capitalism meant, not economic (which as libertarians they favored), but rather government intervention in the marketplace , and they condemned it accordingly as the chief prop of plutocratic class oppression. We have similar concerns about many of the writings of wendy mcelroy, another of todays foremost libertarian feminists.

Its always the , not the abusive man, who needs to vacate the home (to go where?) its likewise the , not the abusive state, that needs to vacate the territory (to go where?). The focus was not to change the status quo in a basic sense, but rather to be included within it. Similarly, while calling for an end to legislation that discriminated against women, 19 -century libertarians like spencer did not confine themselves to that task, but also, as weve seen, addressed the economic and cultural barriers to gender equality, private barriers which they saw as operating in coordination with the governmental barriers.

Andrews looked forward to a future in which with such provision for the care of children, women find it as easy to earn an independent living as men, and thus freed by these changes from the care of the nursery and the household, woman is enabled, even while a mother, to select whatever calling or profession suits her tastes. In short, the exemption-and-deduction regime has grown into a pointless, incoherent agglomeration of nonsensical loopholes, which can allow rich organizations to horde plentiful assets in the midst of poverty. The unjustified expansion of (1) imposes conceptual blinders that make non-violent political action more or less invisible either it is miscategorized with violent political action (as in frequent attacks on antipornography feminists as censors they propose any government action whatever against pornography), or it is marginalized as non-political and therefore not importantly bad (as in facile claims that the free market will simply take care of any problematic wage inequality without any concerted effort), or it is simply ignored.

Yet we know and it is largely owing to mcelroys own efforts that we know that if there are any gender feminists lurking out there, the 19 century individualists, while libertarian, would certainly be found among their ranks. If injustice sways mens public acts, it will inevitably sway their private ones also. In spencers view, the mutual reinforcement between statism, militarism, and patriarchy continued to characterize 19 to the same extent that the triumph of might over right is seen in a nations political institutions, it is seen in its domestic ones.

If we dispense with the limitations imposed by radical menace rhetoric and the authoritarian theory of politics, then what sort of a synthesis between feminism and libertarianism might be possible? We do not intend, here, to try to set out a completed picture we only hope to help with providing the frame. Wherever human beings engage in direct discourse with one another about their mutual rights and responsibilities, there is a politics. And to severely limit or even abolish government does not necessarily remove the need for democratic processes in nongovernmental institutions.

But of course government revenue would go up, and that money could be used to, say, house the homeless and feed the hungry. A woman takes the last name first of her father, then of her husband, just as, traditionally, a slave has taken the last name of his master, changing names every time he changed owners. At least she seems to treat liberal feminism as a form of gender feminism when she writes while libertarians focus on legal restrictions, liberals (those fractious, left-of-center feminists) are apt to focus additionally on restrictive social and cultural norms), which an individual woman is deemed helpless to combat. Since ordinary use identifies market transactions with coordination (mostly) by unintended consequences, and some libertarians identify free action with market transactions by definition, it is easy to conflate (1) and (2), but when you conflate them that puts you in the position of transferring the of (2) to (1), when in fact there there are very good reasons to think that (1) is. Long, toward a libertarian theory of class, frédéric bastiat, speech on the suppression of industrial combinations herbert spencer, , vol.

Why same sex marriage is not an attack on the institution of ...

Same Sex Marriage Should Not Be Allowed Essay

Gay marriage | Lifestyle News & Relationships | news.com.au ...

If understating the difference between two evils trivializes the worse one, overstating the differences trivializes the less bad one. The 19 -century libertarian feminists opposed state action not only because of their moral objections to state coercion but also because they understood the state what ezra heywood called the booted, spurred and whiskered thing called government (in mcelroy 1991, p. To libertarians this may seem paradoxical shouldnt distrusting an institution make one willing to augment its powers, rather than more? But this apparent disconnect is less paradoxical than it seems if state neutrality is a myth, if the state is by nature a tool in the struggle between sexes or classes or both, then it can seem as though the only sensible response is to employ it as just that, rather than trusting to its façade of juridical impartiality. Since then, state and local laws nearly everywhere have exempted nonprofits from all, , property tax and state income tax. A clean house is the womans responsibility a good living is the mans.

This sort of advice draws its entire force from the authoritarian theory of politicsin assuming that state violence is the only politically effective means for combating patriarchy. Meanwhile, although nonprofits cant endorse political candidates, they can be quite partisan and still thrive on the public dole, in the form of tax exemptions and deductions. To ifeminism, the use of force is the salient factor and an individual can cross class lines at any point. Harman saw the non-governmental sources of patriarchy as analogous to the non-governmental sources of chattel slavery (another social evil against which libertarians were especially active in fighting) the crystals that hardened and solidified chattel slavery were partly religious partly economic or industrial, and partly societary. Unfortunately, feminists aiming in good faith at the success of the movement have also responded to radical-baiting by falling into the trap of defining themselves primarily by opposition to the extreme positions of other feminists.

Marry do ill ) victor yarros and anselme bellegarrigue nevertheless advised women to exploit existing gender conventions in order to get themselves supported by a man benjamin tucker and sarah holmes, by contrast, insisted that every individual, whether man or woman, shall be self-supporting, and have an independent home of his or her own. Even the egoist-anarchist benjamin tucker insisted that society is a concrete organism irreducible to its aggregated individual members. For no one has done more than mcelroy to popularize and defend 19 -century libertarian feminism, particularly in its american version. When mcelroy urges that feminist discussions of prostitution need to take seriously what women in prostitution say about it, she is making a point that every feminist ought to keep firmly in mind but her zeal to defend the choices of prostitutes, mcelroy comes close to claiming that critical attention to the authenticity of someone elses choices, or to the cultural or material circumstances that constrain, them is tantamount to treating that person as a child or a mentally incompetent person (p. Democracy should not be reduced to government institutions, but understood to apply to the whole range of our discourses with one another. But mackinnon and other radical feminists are best interpreted, not as claiming a literal equivalence between rape and ordinary intercourse, but only as claiming that the two are a good deal less different than they seem objecting not so much to the distinction as to the of the differences extent and significance. Moreover, spencer saw an intimate connection between the rise of patriarchy and the rise of militarism the primary political differentiation originates from the primary family differentiation. But rather than simply calling for an end to pro-business legislation, they also favored private cooperative action by workers to improve their bargaining power employers or indeed to transcend the wage system altogether hence their support for the labor movement, workers cooperatives, and the like. Such problems as domestic violence and crimes of jealousy, for example, derive, stephen pearl andrews taught, primarily from the inculcation of patriarchal values, which encourage a man to suppose that the woman , not to herself, but to him. If we dispense with the limitations imposed by radical menace rhetoric and the authoritarian theory of politics, then what sort of a synthesis between feminism and libertarianism might be possible? We do not intend, here, to try to set out a completed picture we only hope to help with providing the frame.

Libertarian Feminism: Can This Marriage Be Saved?: Roderick ...